After seeing the comments a couple of weeks ago about the NYT reporting about the bigoted attacks coming out of the mouths of Republicans in the House and the Senate, I had a thought.
Could Sexism Work for Our Side For a Change?
I mean, whatever happened to “the gentle lady from wherever”?
Seriously, we should just nuke every “tradition” in the House and Senate that is based on the assumption of comity. Every single tradition that isn’t actually a rule. Gone. And then when we control that chamber, we need to nuke all the rules that are based on the assumption of comity are gone, too.
But back to my original thought. Since Marge appears to be the face of the new Republican ugliness, maybe sexism can work for our side for a change? Men can be seen as strong or forceful, but all Marge represents is in your face lies, over the top anger and *ugliness, the worst kind of partisanship, and racism. So I’m not sure that strong or forceful is what folks come away with from Marge.
A fair number of people still have conventional views about gender roles, and even though I am not a fan of traditional gender roles, she sure violates every traditional gender role for women that I can come up with. There is an *ugliness about her that brings to mind gender-based insults.
I don’t see how it helps the Republican party to have Marge be the face of it. Is it too much to hope that moderates will see that and be turned off? That they will judge her behavior more harshly than they would judge the same behaviors coming from a man?
In any case, I hope that Marge being the face of the new republican party comes back to bite them in the end.
I know everyone doesn’t read every thread, so here’s the article: On Capitol Hill, Republicans Use Bigoted Attacks Against Political Foes
*ugliness as in mean and nasty, not as in not pretty.
Open thread.












