The U.S. surgeon general has called on Congress to require warning labels on social media platforms similar to those now mandatory on cigarette boxes. pic.twitter.com/UZLEmkAbtV
— The Associated Press (@AP) June 17, 2024
Heard this story on the radio, then saw it on social media where people addicted to social media insist that no, social media is not, nay *cannot* be a problem.
— The Fig Economy (@figgityfigs.bsky.social) Jun 17, 2024 at 8:33 PM
The guy behind the ‘Fig Economy’ label has, IIRC, five (pre-teen) kids. I’m aware that forbidding any form of pop-cult to children is a fool’s game (my mother had a blanket ban on comic books, 60 years ago, which didn’t keep me from becoming a teenage comix geek)… but I think the analogy with warning labels on cigarette packs is apt. Yes, we gave you an IPad to watch Bluey, kid, but TikTok and SnapChat are *not* without risks!
Per the Washington Post, “What research actually says about social media and kids’ health” [gift link]:
… [“>E]xperts — from leading psychologists to free speech advocates — have repeatedly called into question the idea that time on social media like TikTok, Instagram and Snapchat leads directly to poor mental health. The debate is nuanced, they say, and it’s too early to make sweeping statements about kids and social media.
Here’s what we do know about children and teens, social media apps and mental health.
Late Night Open Thread: Do ‘We’ Need Social Media Warning Labels?Post + Comments (81)






